=COUSINS=

A newsletter pertaining
to the descendants of
Robert Pépin and Marie Crête

February 2004 -- Vol 5, No. 2

In this month's COUSINS:

What's New
This month's Feature Recap of the parents and siblings of Marie-Louise GRENIER
Ramblings From the Editor
NewsLetter info

(To return to the top, click on the decorative bars)

   

WHAT'S NEW

Well, I suppose it’s not new news that the news letter is coming out a little later in the month this month …

First of all, Happy Valentine’s day to you all.

Second a new cousin has joined us – Paulette from Maine.  She descends from John Mclure and Jeanne Finn through their son André.

And, I am now an official, card-carrying Métis.

THIS MONTH'S FEATURE: Madeleine PEPIN and her husband Jacques DUCHESNEAU dit Sansregret

Last month, we did a recap of Marie-Louise’s folks and siblings

This month we look at Marie Louise’s cousin, Madeleine PEPIN and her husband Jacques DUCHESNEAU dit Sansregret

Madeleine PEPIN (IIILouis, IIJean, IRobert) daughter of Louis Pepin and Marie Martin dit Jolicoeur dit Lachance, born and baptized 15 Aug 1727,

and

Jacques DUCHESNEAU dit Sansregret, son of René Duchesneau dit Sansregret and Marguerite BALAN, was baptized 30 June 1723; buried 9 Oct 1780

married 15 Jan 1748, in Québec City

Madeleine and Jacques had 12 children

1. René DUCHESNEAU, baptized 31 Oct 1748
2. François-Xavier DUCHESNEAU, baptized 8 April; buried 22 Dec 1750, in Charlesbourg
3. Louis-Antoine DUCHESNEAU, baptized 2 March 1752; married Elisabeth DASYLVA, 8 July 1782, in Québec
4. François DUCHESNEAU, baptized 3 March 1753; buried 21 Aug 1753, in Lorette
5. Marie-Anne DUCHESNEAU, baptized 6 June 1754; buried 14 Aug 1754
6. Jacques DUCHESNEAU, baptized 12 Nov 1755; married Marie-Louise BRUNET, 20 July 1778, Québec
7. Michel DUCHESNEAU, baptized 26 March; buried 29 march 1758
8. Marie-Madeleine DUCHESNEAU, baptized 26 March 1757; buried 29 Mar 1757
9. Madeleine DUCHESNEAU, baptized 23 July 1758
10. Louis DUCHESNEAU, baptized 28 Nov 1759
11. Charles-François DUCHESNEAU, baptized 16 Sept 1763; buried 20 Sept 1761
12. Joseph DUCHESNEAU, baptized 17 March 1763; buried 20 April 1763

If you can add/subtract/change any of this, send it on via email

 RAMBLINGS FROM THE EDITOR

Some of you may be sitting their thinking, “So just what IS a Métis?”   Some of you may not.  Some of you may not even care.

Welcome to Métis 101.

It has been said that the first Métis was born 9 months after the Norse tried to colonize Newfoundland in the 14th and 15th century.  Some folks have been known to ask, “Gee I wonder what happened to those Norse settlers?”  Well—

Well, the Norse colony disappeared, and, despite their best efforts, archeologists haven’t been able to find enough remains to account for all of the settlers, yet when Europe’s turn came to discover North America, they were surprised to find blue eyes on the folks already living there.  I think *that’s* a no-brainer.

Words describing people who have Aboriginal/[fill in the blank] ancestry are many and varied.  Métis–pronounced “may-TEE”–comes from the Latin miscere, meaning “to mix” as well as from Old French/Canadian French, meaning ‘of mixed race’ (from Late Latin mixtcius, mixed), and is used to describe the children of Aboriginal women and European men. 

Another term for Métis–Bois Brule–comes from the Ojibwa word wissakodewinmi, meaning “half-burnt woodsmen”, which described a complexion comparatively lighter than that of the Aboriginal side of the family.  Other terms include Country-born, Black Scots, Métis anglais, The Flower Bead Word People, The Buffalo People, Breeds, and Half-breeds.  But, to quote The Metis Home page at http://www.geocities.com/SoHo/Atrium/4832/metis.html “One consistent characteristic that describes the Metis is implicit in the name the Cree gave them o-tee-paym-soo-wuk, which means “their own boss” or “people who own themselves”. 

The Métis call themselves The Forgotten People.

Seems pretty straight forward, doesn’t it?

Now we get into the interpretation of just what exactly qualifies one as Métis.

Speaking historically, you can get a pretty good idea from the above definitions above, but to simplify things, Métis went from being French/Cree, to French/Cree from Red River, and now to being of European and Aboriginal descent.

Currently there are four main schools of thought

One maintains that to be Métis one must have a French parent and a Cree parent.  Period.  End of sentence.

Another says that you can be Métis only if you descend from someone from Red River.  To prove your Red River connections, your ancestor had to have been eligible for and/or received Script.

Yet others say you have to be of French/Cree ancestry AND trace back to Red River.

The last is the one that those who descend from the fur trappers, like the branch of us who descend from Etienne Pépin and his Aboriginal wife, Isabelle Kwantlen, and Alfred John Houston and his Aboriginal wife Sophia Giordan (son of E & I married daughter of A & S).  Though Etienne was Canadian French, he may very well have been Métis, through his paternal grandmother, Madeleine Lajeunesse, Etienne’s son, Simon, definitely WAS Métis, as was Simon’s wife Emma Sarah Houston.

The more I learn about the Métis, the better I understand the branch of the family I come from.  The descendants of Donald Louis Peppan and Catherine Marie Stuckey might want to take a read through the web pages that start at http://www.geocities.com/SoHo/Atrium/4832/metis.html, then go by http://www.vancouvermetis.com/ for the application forms.  That would be, um, Diane, Kathy, La Donna, Jim, Sherry, Kevin, Christopher, Sue, Frank, Bob, Robert, Rachel, Jason, Nicole, Marcus, Patty, Jennifer, Buddy, Robbyn, Joe, Don, and Jim; for the same reason I qualify, you all qualify.  Contact me with any and all questions.

Being Métis is very very odd thing, especially having been raised in the US, where one’s ethnic heritage is categorized by what ever the Politically Correct Term of the Month is.  There are many varying shades of this and that, including Pacific Islander, but when you get to folks whose ancestors watched wave after wave Old World explorers discover their home, you either are or you aren’t; in the US 51% of a person’s ancestry must be Native American to qualify one as a Native American.  Some of the smaller recognized tribes can go lower; Grays Harbor goes as low as 1/32, as do the Mono of Northern California.  Yes, I said “recognized”; some tribes are not, even though they’ve been living in the same spot since before the Eric the Red said, “Ég furða ef land er til the vestur-? Hvaða the Helvíti, við fara útlit*” AND meet the blood quantum requirements.

The US also doesn’t recognize the Métis, except with words and attitudes that made Métis who grew up in the first half of the 20th century bury their ancestry, and bury it deep to save the following generations the shame and humiliation of their ancestry.  This was true with my grandfather and his three children.  Métis is a Canadian thing.

From the get go, the Métis were there.  Not long after Norse went a Viking and stumbled onto Newfoundland.  When France started a colony in the New World in 1608, the French men coming to prepare the colony didn’t bring women with them.  Some of the folks living in what is now eastern Canada weren’t particularly enthused about the new neighbours, and worked real hard to run them off.  Others thought that maybe the new neighbours might be a cool thing.  And you *know* that about 9 months later there were children born whose complexions were comparatively lighter than that of their Mothers.

When the Hudson’s Bay Company arrived on the scene, they used Métis guides, and their employees made liaisons with Aboriginal women to better the trade between the HBC and the local folks.  These were most often Country Marriages, or “marriage after the fashion of the country”, with no church officials involved.  The man or the woman could go any time s/he chose, but most often it was the men, moving on to another area, and leaving his country wife and any children behind—though some took their sons and had them educated back home in the Old World.

By the middle of the 19th century, both Aboriginal and Métisse wives were out of fashion.  In the 19th century the status of most women was based solely upon those of their husbands.  As the trapped out areas became settled, European women started to arrive, bringing with them organized religion, which is why some folks said that HBC stood not for the Hudson’s Bay Company but for “Here Before Christ” (They’re also referred to as the Horny Boys Club, but I won’t mention that here, ‘cause it isn’t polite).

It was a dicey thing for the early Men of the Church, most especially for those who maintained the then popular belief that Aboriginal people and even some Métis had no souls and were no better than animals, so the trapper/traders who genuinely wanted to make their country marriages into “church” marriages could not.  Others, like Fathers Demers and Blanchet, who came west in the 1840s (some 20+ years after the first fur traders entered the area), said something to the effect of, “Of course we can see how devoted to each other you are and look at al your fine children.  And we understand that you have married according to the customs of your wife’s people, but-- well … I don’t suppose you would like— but no—well, maybe you would like to celebrate your many happy years together with a Catholic ceremony…?”  And yes, as a matter of fact, the families of both Demers and Blanchet DO appear in the Monster Data Base (as does the families of Father Cyprien Tanguay, Drouin, and René Jetté).

Some one some where told me that I might make some un-friends with my research on the First Families of Québec.  I asked why.  The reply was: “Because some of them are not as white as they claim to be.”  But you know…

Time has come to stop hiding.

* “I wonder if there land is to the west?  What the Hell, let’s go look.”

NEWSLETTER INFORMATION

     If you are reading this online because you no longer receive it via email, and you would like to receive via email again, drop me an email.

     If you are reading this online because you asked to receive via email and it hasn’t happened yet, drop me an email.

     If you have family you want to share this with but they don't have a computer, please feel free to print it out and share it with them.  If you have family with a computer and/or Internet access who you think might be interested in the newsletter, drop'em an e-mail and let'em know about it; feel free to pass along my e-mail address.

     Back issues of COUSINS can be found at:
http://www.fortlangley.ca/pepin/cousins.html

     This URL will take you to the COUSINS Front Desk.  Or, you can click on any of the red lions that appear on the Pepin pages and Site Directory.

      For a hard copy of the newsletter, send an email to lisa@fortlangley.ca, and if for
any reason you wish to change the way you receive the newsletter -- or if you no longer wish to receive COUSINS -- drop me an e-mail at lisa@fortlangley.ca and tell me.  If you just wanted to chat, drop me an email.

 

COUSINS
comes out once a month -- more or less

This month's was finished
15 February 2004, 1:37 A.M. PST

 

=>[Back to The Front Desk]<=

Thanks for stopping by
Sign My Guestbook
Get your own FREE Guestbook from htmlGEAR
View My Guestbook
SITE DIRECTORY

Put up 15 January 2004