|
November 2004 -- Vol 5, No. 11
In this month's COUSINS:
(To return to the top, click on the
decorative bars)
WHAT'S NEW
Y’know, I figured that, what with the re-enactment
season over, things wouldn’t be so crazy. I was, to a point, correct.
With all that free time I figured it was Time to get my
fiction manuscript printed out and off to a publisher. In the process, I got so
pre-occupied, the month got away with me – and it still isn’t off to the
publisher.
I got my 123,700 word opus printed out, along with
accompanying cover letter, and the really cool map I made (Fantasy of the
Science Fiction/Fantasy variety simply must have a map). I had the box to mail
it all off to Daw in, but, somehow, somewhere, I’d made some errors in numbering
the pages and hand correcting is tacky and has been known to turn editors off.
As if that wasn’t enough, the printer had simply not printed 8 pages, right in
the middle. Even though I had been sitting right there during the entire print,
I still looked under all the furniture, just to be certain. But no, no missing
8 pages.
It’s been a good printer, and still is for single page
printing, but as I intend to pursue writing in a serious manner, I’m gonna have
to get a new printer. Don’t get me wrong, Lexmark makes a really fine printer
–the ink is a little pricey and is only good for about 600 pages– and this Z42
has lasted much longer than its predecessor, a Cannon BJC something-or-other,
but it is New Printer Time. Until then, I may check around and see how often
one can refill an ink cartridge before the little computer chip stuff on the
cartridge body gives up the ghost (this one has been re-filled 4 or 5 times now,
and the letters aren’t as crisp as they once were [but $20 beats $40]). And I’m
going to call around to assorted printers to see what the cost of printing 640
double-spaced pages might be, and if it beats the cost of a ream of good 20
pound bond paper and a new ink cartridge.

THIS MONTH'S FEATURE:
THIS MONTH'S FEATURE: the children of
Marie-Jeanne PEPIN and husband Louis-Joseph ROY
Last month we recapped the children of
III-Charles PEPIN and wife Marie-Louise MERCEREAU.
This month we look at the children of
Marie-Jeanne PEPIN and husband Louis-Joseph ROY.
Marie-Jeanne is the daughter and 8th
child of II-Jean PÉPIN and wife Marguerite MOREAU. She was baptized 13 June
1707, in Charlesbourg, Québec.
On 18 July 1735 she married
Louis-Joseph ROY, son of II--Jean ROY
dir AUDY and wife Thérèse JOBIN. He was baptized 19 Oct 1698. This is his
third marriage. His first wife, 21 Oct 1726 at Château-Richer, was Marguerite
LEFRANÇOIS, daughter of Alexis-Nicolas LEFRANÇOIS and wife Madeleine LEFEBVRE;
3 children. His second wife, 21 April 1732, was Marie-Elisabeth PICHET,
daughter of Jacques PICHET and wife Louise ASSELIN; 1 child.
According to Tanguay, they had 11
children.
| 1. |
Marie-Jeanne ROY, baptized 7 June 1736. |
| 2. |
Marie-Louise ROY dit AUDY, baptised 10 July 1737; married Ignace
CARON 3 July 1770 |
| 3. |
Joseph-Charles ROY, baptized 3 Nov 1739; married
Marie-Joseph FILION 1766 |
| 4. |
Louis ROY 23 Jan 1740 |
| 5. |
Marguerite ROY, baptized 2 March 1741 |
| 6. |
Pierre ROY, baptized 15 Oct 1742; buried 2 Jan
1749 |
| 7. |
Charles-Joseph ROY, baptized 13 April 1744 |
| 8. |
Madeleine ROY, baptized 25 March 1746 |
| 9. |
Jean-François ROY, baptized 23 Aug 1747; buried
21 Sept 1747 |
| 10. |
Jean-Simon ROY, baptized 27 Oct 1748 |
| 11. |
Pierre ROY, baptized 3 July 1751 |
If you can add/subtract/change any of this, send it on via email.

UNIDENTIFIED PEPINS
One of the things I truly enjoy about Living
History is the many different interests among those who play in the past.
One of my friends can trace her family lines back to what has been called
a French utopian experiment at Cloverdale, California. She, in fact,
loaned me a book about this community, entitled A Photographic History
of Icaria-Speranza; A French utopian experiment at Cloverdale, California,
edited by Dale W. Ross. The National Icarian Heritage Society published
the booklet –more a 40-page pamphlet than a full-fledged book– in July
1989.
Why do I mention this?
Well, see, in three different photographs in this
booklet there are people with the surname PEPIN. My friend noticed this
right off and asked me if I knew who they were.
Photograph #1, Pg 19 Icaria-Speranza Colony,
1881: George Pepin (child), Lizette Leroux Pepin (adult), Jeanette Pepin
Hall (child), Ellen Pepin (child).
Photograph #2, Pg 20 Icaria-Speranza Colony,
1882: Ellen Pepin (child), Jeanette Pepin Hall (child), Lizette Laroux
Pepin (adult), George Pepin (child) .
Photograph #3, Pg 36 “Visit from French
newspaper reporters”, circa 1907, shows George Pepin again, this time
standing head and shoulders with the men surrounding him. A handsome
devil, he is, like so many of the men in our family.
Now, I’m thinking that Lizette Laroux Pepin is
probably a Laroux who married a Pepin, but who was her Pepin husband? I
also think Lizaette is probably the mother of George and Ellen. And could
Jeannette be a sister-in-law to Lizette …?
A Photographic History of Icaria-Speranza
does a wonderful job of explaining what the French utopian experiment was,
as well as why they did it, but names in photograph captions are the only
mentions of Pepins in this book.
I wish I could offer more information but <shrug>
I can’t.
Anyone claim these Pepins as kin?
Inquiring minds want to know.

RAMBLINGS
FROM THE EDITOR
I’m sure you’ve all seen the ads for Video
Professor. They’re all over the place. And they make themselves sound so
very good and O! so accommodating.
After seeing one of their commercials, I thought it
might be kinda cool to see if there was something new I could learn about
Front Page --the program I use for my web design endeavors-- so I went for
it.
Then I received a notice advising me that my bank
account was overdrawn by $30.34 on the 27th of October. Upon further
investigation, I found that it was because my account was charged $69.95 . .
. this is on top of the $6.95 shipping and handling fee that I was charged
on October 12th. Needless to say, I was not prepared for this fee. I
hadn't received any product from them, yet.
There was an 800 number on the bank statement. I
called. I found out that the $69.95 was for the first CD, not the
second. One offer they made to this disgruntled customer was that if I
agreed to keep the 1st and the second, I would be sent a third CD for FREE.
I said no. The 1st was supposed to be for free, and obviously was not. So
after a bit more discussion, my account was cancelled, I received the
special codes for returning merchandise, along with the special instructions
for returning the merchandise (mail both CDs back in a bubble wrap
envelope), with the added proviso that I could fax a copy of my bank
overdraft to a certain person with an explanation as to why I thought Video
Professor owned me my overdraft fee.
I do have to offer kudos to that first phone
rep for being such a wonderful human being about the whole thing. It cannot
be an easy job. I’ve done phone work and after we’d covered everything that
needed covering, I said, “And I hope the rest of the people you talk to
today are satisfied customers.” Replied the Phone Rep, with a snort, “I
don’t think so, but thanks for the thought.”
After speaking with
Video Professor's phone rep, I was certain the phone rep had the best
intentions, but wasn't so sure about the company, and figured that if I had
ANY trouble
from them, I was going straight to the Media with it.
Yes, Family, I was that annoyed.
The second video
arrived and I called Video Professor to confirm the return address. The second phone rep was smooth and
polished and started to say something quite like, “Oh, but I see here that
it says you received the first video.” I cut that rep short by saying, “I
said no such thing” because I hadn’t, and I suspect that the first rep may,
even as I type, be employed elsewhere. I elaborated about how I had not
received the first video then, I still had not, and the second video, which
had arrived the day before, would be going out in the next day’s mail,
ending that long and convoluted sentence with, “I am a MOST dissatisfied
customer” in a tone of voice that said, “Go ahead, push me
harder---please.”
Well, ladies and gentlemen, the “catch” –as it was
explained to me by the second rep (though not in so few words)-- is that
somewhere, in tiny little letters, it says that the first video is free for
10 days, after that it costs $69.95. However, the first video did not
arrive in that first 10 days, thus I had no way of knowing. Wonder how many
other people this has happened to, and how much Video Professor has profited
by it?
What makes me wonder even more. . . ?
Three days after my second phone call I received a
card in the mail --the same mail I’m presuming the first video was sent
by—from Video Professor. On it, it affirms in
plain black letters that I will be refunded my $69.95 and that other than
the complimentary copy of Video Professor’s Front Page tutorial they were
mailing me, I would never receive another item from Video Professor, nor would
I ever be billed for anything by Video Professor ever again. AND . . . the
very next day my complimentary copy Video Professor’s Front Page tutorial
arrived . . . the same day my $69.95 refund arrived in my bank account. It was not
that errant first video, oh no. It contained paperwork saying FREE and
COMPLIMENTARY and THANK YOU! The first video, the one that created all the
commotion, is still lost somewhere in SnailMail Land.
It really makes me wonder.
Mind you, this is just one person’s experience with Video Professor. Your
mileage may vary. If
you’ve had successful dealings with them, I’d love to hear about it.

NEWSLETTER INFORMATION
If you are reading this online because you no longer receive it via
email, and you would like to receive via email again, drop me an email.
If you are reading this online because you asked to receive via email
and it hasn’t happened yet, drop me an email.
If you have family you want to share this with but they don't have a
computer, please feel free to print it out and share it with them. If
you have family with a computer and/or Internet access who you think might
be interested in the newsletter, drop'em an e-mail and let'em know about it;
feel free to pass along my e-mail address.
Back issues of COUSINS can be found at:
http://www.fortlangley.ca/pepin/cousins.html
This URL will take you to the COUSINS Front Desk.
Or, you can click on any of the red lions that appear on the Pepin pages and
Site Directory.
For a hard copy of the newsletter, send an
email to lisa@fortlangley.ca, and
if for any reason you wish to change the way you receive the newsletter --
or if you no longer wish to receive COUSINS -- drop me an e-mail at lisa@fortlangley.ca
and tell me. If you just wanted
to chat, drop me an email.

COUSINS
comes out once a month --
more or less
This month's was finished 22 November 2004, 8:12
PM PDST
|